<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 634 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283412</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes. It upheld the validity of proceedings under section 17 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. However, it ruled that the land allotted by CIDCO did not belong to the assessee under section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983. Therefore, the market value of the land was not included in the wealth-tax assessments for the relevant years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2019 14:30:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 634 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283412</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes. It upheld the validity of proceedings under section 17 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. However, it ruled that the land allotted by CIDCO did not belong to the assessee under section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983. Therefore, the market value of the land was not included in the wealth-tax assessments for the relevant years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>