<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (10) TMI 383 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283411</link>
    <description>The Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s decision in the miscellaneous application was a valid rectification of a mistake under Section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and not a review of its earlier order. The rectification aligned with earlier findings by the Income-tax Officer and Commissioner, remaining uncontested by the Department or the assessee. The parties were instructed to bear their own costs in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2019 14:19:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (10) TMI 383 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283411</link>
      <description>The Court held that the Tribunal&#039;s decision in the miscellaneous application was a valid rectification of a mistake under Section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and not a review of its earlier order. The rectification aligned with earlier findings by the Income-tax Officer and Commissioner, remaining uncontested by the Department or the assessee. The parties were instructed to bear their own costs in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>