<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 875 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386107</link>
    <description>In a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, continued custody beyond sixty days without filing of a complaint or charge-sheet supported release on regular bail. The Court considered the arrest, the absence of prosecutorial filing within the stipulated time, and the elapsed custody period, and treated these factors as sufficient to favour enlargement on bail without entering into the merits in detail. Regular bail was granted on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 875 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386107</link>
      <description>In a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, continued custody beyond sixty days without filing of a complaint or charge-sheet supported release on regular bail. The Court considered the arrest, the absence of prosecutorial filing within the stipulated time, and the elapsed custody period, and treated these factors as sufficient to favour enlargement on bail without entering into the merits in detail. Regular bail was granted on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>