<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 859 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386091</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the excess stock of Rs. 4,70,54,450 was part of the regular business income and not an unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act. It also confirmed that the assessee was entitled to set off its business loss of Rs. 1,17,55,657 against the income assessed under Section 69 for the assessment year 2015-16.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2019 09:09:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 859 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386091</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the excess stock of Rs. 4,70,54,450 was part of the regular business income and not an unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act. It also confirmed that the assessee was entitled to set off its business loss of Rs. 1,17,55,657 against the income assessed under Section 69 for the assessment year 2015-16.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>