https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386081 The Bombay High Court dealt with a challenge to the Policy Interpretation Committee's reading of paragraph 3.12.1 of the FTP 2009-14 on the "Served from India" scheme, including the view that the policy does not incentivise brands created outside India and that an Indian brand must be recognisable domestically and internationally. Because a Division Bench had already dismissed identical writ challenges on the same issue in an earlier order dated 17 August 2015, the Court declined to reopen the interpretation. Applying judicial discipline, it dismissed the petition without fresh adjudication of the impugned administrative order or the policy interpretation. en-us Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Sep 2019 08:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386081 The Bombay High Court dealt with a challenge to the Policy Interpretation Committee's reading of paragraph 3.12.1 of the FTP 2009-14 on the "Served from India" scheme, including the view that the policy does not incentivise brands created outside India and that an Indian brand must be recognisable domestically and internationally. Because a Division Bench had already dismissed identical writ challenges on the same issue in an earlier order dated 17 August 2015, the Court declined to reopen the interpretation. Applying judicial discipline, it dismissed the petition without fresh adjudication of the impugned administrative order or the policy interpretation. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386081