https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386069 The Tribunal referred the case to a larger bench to decide on the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on input services used for erecting telecom towers. The Tribunal deferred the consideration of the limitation issue and penalties until after the larger bench's decision on the primary issue. The specific question referred for decision was whether CENVAT Credit for input services like construction, erection, commissioning, and technical testing used for erecting telecom towers is admissible. en-us Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jan 2020 12:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386069 The Tribunal referred the case to a larger bench to decide on the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on input services used for erecting telecom towers. The Tribunal deferred the consideration of the limitation issue and penalties until after the larger bench's decision on the primary issue. The specific question referred for decision was whether CENVAT Credit for input services like construction, erection, commissioning, and technical testing used for erecting telecom towers is admissible. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386069