<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 828 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386060</link>
    <description>An inter-corporate deposit or loan between companies does not fall within the MPID Act&#039;s definition of &quot;deposit&quot; because the Act is aimed at protecting ordinary and unsuspecting depositors from fraudulent financial establishments, not regulating business-to-business funding arrangements. The Court noted that the Companies Act, 1956/2013 and the Deposit Rules specifically exclude amounts received by one company from another company from the concept of deposit, and that treating such transactions as deposits under the MPID Act would create overlap with company-law remedies and dilute protection for small depositors. The inter-corporate deposits were therefore excluded from MPID proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2019 07:23:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 828 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386060</link>
      <description>An inter-corporate deposit or loan between companies does not fall within the MPID Act&#039;s definition of &quot;deposit&quot; because the Act is aimed at protecting ordinary and unsuspecting depositors from fraudulent financial establishments, not regulating business-to-business funding arrangements. The Court noted that the Companies Act, 1956/2013 and the Deposit Rules specifically exclude amounts received by one company from another company from the concept of deposit, and that treating such transactions as deposits under the MPID Act would create overlap with company-law remedies and dilute protection for small depositors. The inter-corporate deposits were therefore excluded from MPID proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>