<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 816 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386048</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the issues raised by the Revenue regarding job work and suppressed production were deemed factual and not substantial questions of law. The Court upheld the findings in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the Revenue&#039;s contentions did not warrant interference. After a comprehensive review, the Court concluded that there was no substantial question of law involved in the case, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 15:46:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 816 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386048</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the issues raised by the Revenue regarding job work and suppressed production were deemed factual and not substantial questions of law. The Court upheld the findings in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the Revenue&#039;s contentions did not warrant interference. After a comprehensive review, the Court concluded that there was no substantial question of law involved in the case, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>