<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 812 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386044</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessments for AY 2006-07 and 2007-08, along with additions of unexplained income and enhancement of income. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to disclose material facts and provide satisfactory evidence to prove the genuineness of transactions and donations received. The appeals filed by the assessee were dismissed for both assessment years, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities and the CBI investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 15:45:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 812 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386044</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessments for AY 2006-07 and 2007-08, along with additions of unexplained income and enhancement of income. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to disclose material facts and provide satisfactory evidence to prove the genuineness of transactions and donations received. The appeals filed by the assessee were dismissed for both assessment years, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities and the CBI investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>