<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 9 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19811</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, confirming that the revised returns filed by the petitioner would be treated as filed under the amnesty scheme. The petitioner was entitled to all benefits of the scheme, including immunity from penalties. The non-petitioner was prohibited from further penalty proceedings based on the assessment order, and demand notices for penalties against the petitioner were quashed. The petition was allowed with no costs ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:08:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 9 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19811</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, confirming that the revised returns filed by the petitioner would be treated as filed under the amnesty scheme. The petitioner was entitled to all benefits of the scheme, including immunity from penalties. The non-petitioner was prohibited from further penalty proceedings based on the assessment order, and demand notices for penalties against the petitioner were quashed. The petition was allowed with no costs ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>