<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 806 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386038</link>
    <description>The tribunal remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication as the relevant facts were not fully brought on record. The tribunal emphasized the need for translated documents for a fair rebuttal by the assessee. Both the quantum appeal and penalty appeal were allowed for statistical purposes, with issues remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication after considering all relevant evidence and translations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 15:21:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 806 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386038</link>
      <description>The tribunal remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication as the relevant facts were not fully brought on record. The tribunal emphasized the need for translated documents for a fair rebuttal by the assessee. Both the quantum appeal and penalty appeal were allowed for statistical purposes, with issues remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication after considering all relevant evidence and translations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>