<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 798 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, SINGLE BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386030</link>
    <description>An unregistered sale agreement and claim acknowledgement letter signed by the company&#039;s managing director and director, and bearing the corporate seal, were held admissible to prove the underlying transaction and a collateral arrangement, even though the documents could not operate as a conveyance of immovable property. The tribunal found the agreement sufficiently stamped, supported by surrounding correspondence and recitals, and not displaced by the absence of accounting entries or an unsupported allegation of misuse of blank papers. It also held that the resolution professional lacked adjudicatory power to reject a substantiated claim on those grounds. The claim was therefore treated as financial debt and admitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 14:16:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 798 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, SINGLE BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386030</link>
      <description>An unregistered sale agreement and claim acknowledgement letter signed by the company&#039;s managing director and director, and bearing the corporate seal, were held admissible to prove the underlying transaction and a collateral arrangement, even though the documents could not operate as a conveyance of immovable property. The tribunal found the agreement sufficiently stamped, supported by surrounding correspondence and recitals, and not displaced by the absence of accounting entries or an unsupported allegation of misuse of blank papers. It also held that the resolution professional lacked adjudicatory power to reject a substantiated claim on those grounds. The claim was therefore treated as financial debt and admitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>