https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386027 Interim protection was granted against further proceedings initiated under the impugned communications, because the court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and risk of irreparable loss in favour of the petitioner. The order relied on Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994, Rule 5A of the Service Tax Rules, the saving principle in Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, and Sections 173 and 174 of the CGST Act, 2017. Accordingly, further proceedings pursuant to the impugned communications were stayed until disposal of the writ petition. en-us Mon, 02 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386027 Interim protection was granted against further proceedings initiated under the impugned communications, because the court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and risk of irreparable loss in favour of the petitioner. The order relied on Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994, Rule 5A of the Service Tax Rules, the saving principle in Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, and Sections 173 and 174 of the CGST Act, 2017. Accordingly, further proceedings pursuant to the impugned communications were stayed until disposal of the writ petition. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 02 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386027