https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386026 Interim stay of proceedings was granted where the petitioner showed a prima facie case under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994, Rule 5A of the Service Tax Rules, Sections 6(1) and (2) of the General Clauses Act, and Sections 173 and 174 of the CGST Act, 2017. The court found that the balance of convenience favoured the petitioner and that irreparable loss would result if protection was refused. On that basis, further proceedings pursuant to the impugned communications were stayed until disposal of the writ petition. en-us Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386026 Interim stay of proceedings was granted where the petitioner showed a prima facie case under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994, Rule 5A of the Service Tax Rules, Sections 6(1) and (2) of the General Clauses Act, and Sections 173 and 174 of the CGST Act, 2017. The court found that the balance of convenience favoured the petitioner and that irreparable loss would result if protection was refused. On that basis, further proceedings pursuant to the impugned communications were stayed until disposal of the writ petition. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386026