https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386021 The Judicial Member ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against the rejection of CENVAT credit for the purchase of iron ore. The appellant had paid service tax on royalty charges for the iron ore, considering them as Business Support Services. The Judicial Member found merit in the appellant's argument, emphasizing their compliance with tax obligations and entitlement to the credit. The decision overturned the Commissioner(Appeals)'s ruling, highlighting the importance of recognizing the appellant's right to claim CENVAT credit based on legal precedents and tax compliance. en-us Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:15:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386021 The Judicial Member ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against the rejection of CENVAT credit for the purchase of iron ore. The appellant had paid service tax on royalty charges for the iron ore, considering them as Business Support Services. The Judicial Member found merit in the appellant's argument, emphasizing their compliance with tax obligations and entitlement to the credit. The decision overturned the Commissioner(Appeals)'s ruling, highlighting the importance of recognizing the appellant's right to claim CENVAT credit based on legal precedents and tax compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386021