<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 785 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386017</link>
    <description>The court upheld the lower courts&#039; decisions, dismissing the petition and directing the accused to surrender for sentencing. The defense&#039;s arguments failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the accused&#039;s explanations insufficient, emphasizing the importance of proof over mere explanations. All pending applications were disposed of, and bail bonds were canceled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 12:48:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 785 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386017</link>
      <description>The court upheld the lower courts&#039; decisions, dismissing the petition and directing the accused to surrender for sentencing. The defense&#039;s arguments failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the accused&#039;s explanations insufficient, emphasizing the importance of proof over mere explanations. All pending applications were disposed of, and bail bonds were canceled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>