<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1626 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283372</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings due to lack of fresh material for reopening. The issue of Broken Period Interest was dismissed as academic. The Tribunal upheld that Section 115JB does not apply to banking companies and directed a fresh computation of interest payable under Section 244A in accordance with legal precedent, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 12:47:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1626 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283372</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings due to lack of fresh material for reopening. The issue of Broken Period Interest was dismissed as academic. The Tribunal upheld that Section 115JB does not apply to banking companies and directed a fresh computation of interest payable under Section 244A in accordance with legal precedent, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>