https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283376 The appeal was filed against the rejection of the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, due to a pre-existing dispute. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned by the Tribunal. The Tribunal noted the presence of the pre-existing dispute as crucial in the rejection of the application. Allegations of fraud by the respondent were made, but the Tribunal clarified that the issue of fraud was not within its purview. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that the rejection was justified due to the pre-existing dispute, and the question of fraud would be decided by the Court of competent jurisdiction. en-us Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Sep 2019 12:47:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283376 The appeal was filed against the rejection of the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, due to a pre-existing dispute. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned by the Tribunal. The Tribunal noted the presence of the pre-existing dispute as crucial in the rejection of the application. Allegations of fraud by the respondent were made, but the Tribunal clarified that the issue of fraud was not within its purview. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that the rejection was justified due to the pre-existing dispute, and the question of fraud would be decided by the Court of competent jurisdiction. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283376