https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283364 The Tribunal dismissed the application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as there was a valid pre-existing dispute between the parties regarding the quality of goods supplied by the Applicant to the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal found that the Corporate Debtor had raised concerns about the fabric quality before the notice under section 8 of the Code was served, indicating a genuine dispute that required further investigation. The presence of this dispute led to the rejection of the insolvency application. en-us Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Sep 2019 12:46:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283364 The Tribunal dismissed the application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as there was a valid pre-existing dispute between the parties regarding the quality of goods supplied by the Applicant to the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal found that the Corporate Debtor had raised concerns about the fabric quality before the notice under section 8 of the Code was served, indicating a genuine dispute that required further investigation. The presence of this dispute led to the rejection of the insolvency application. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283364