<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1929 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283367</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court upheld the decision favoring the assessee, ruling that the reassessment proceedings initiated beyond the four-year period were time-barred. The Court emphasized the lack of justification for reopening the assessment, as the Assessing Officer failed to establish any omission by the assessee in disclosing material facts during the original assessment. Both the Tribunal and the Commissioner had previously ruled against the Revenue, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with no substantial legal questions identified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 12:46:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=588024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1929 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283367</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court upheld the decision favoring the assessee, ruling that the reassessment proceedings initiated beyond the four-year period were time-barred. The Court emphasized the lack of justification for reopening the assessment, as the Assessing Officer failed to establish any omission by the assessee in disclosing material facts during the original assessment. Both the Tribunal and the Commissioner had previously ruled against the Revenue, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with no substantial legal questions identified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>