https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283366 Section 17 of the amended Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 enlarges an arbitral tribunal's power to grant interim measures and makes its orders enforceable like court orders, but it does not authorise the tribunal to appoint an officer or department of the High Court itself as receiver. The Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay, remains an establishment under the High Court's exclusive administrative control, and directions concerning that office had historically issued only from the High Court, save for limited transitional situations. The power to appoint a receiver under Section 17 is confined to appointing a fit person in the ordinary civil-law sense. An arbitral tribunal therefore cannot appoint the Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay, as receiver. en-us Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Sep 2019 12:46:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283366 Section 17 of the amended Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 enlarges an arbitral tribunal's power to grant interim measures and makes its orders enforceable like court orders, but it does not authorise the tribunal to appoint an officer or department of the High Court itself as receiver. The Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay, remains an establishment under the High Court's exclusive administrative control, and directions concerning that office had historically issued only from the High Court, save for limited transitional situations. The power to appoint a receiver under Section 17 is confined to appointing a fit person in the ordinary civil-law sense. An arbitral tribunal therefore cannot appoint the Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay, as receiver. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283366