https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283350 The prosecution proved that the accused inflicted the fatal injuries on his wife and child because he was found at the scene with a bloodstained chopper, the room was chained from inside, and the medical evidence showed ante-mortem injuries sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death. The plea of insanity under Section 84 IPC failed because the defence did not establish that, at the time of the act, unsoundness of mind deprived him of the capacity to know the nature of the act or that it was wrong or contrary to law. The conviction and sentence were upheld. en-us Wed, 09 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Sep 2019 12:27:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283350 The prosecution proved that the accused inflicted the fatal injuries on his wife and child because he was found at the scene with a bloodstained chopper, the room was chained from inside, and the medical evidence showed ante-mortem injuries sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death. The plea of insanity under Section 84 IPC failed because the defence did not establish that, at the time of the act, unsoundness of mind deprived him of the capacity to know the nature of the act or that it was wrong or contrary to law. The conviction and sentence were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283350