<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 67 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19802</link>
    <description>The court held that Rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957 is mandatory for valuing unquoted shares and must be applied without exception. Tax liability on enhanced compensation not provided in the balance-sheet cannot be deducted. Enhanced compensation must be included in the net wealth of the company for valuing unquoted shares. The court ruled against the assessee in various wealth-tax references, affirming the Revenue&#039;s position on the issues. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 67 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19802</link>
      <description>The court held that Rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957 is mandatory for valuing unquoted shares and must be applied without exception. Tax liability on enhanced compensation not provided in the balance-sheet cannot be deducted. Enhanced compensation must be included in the net wealth of the company for valuing unquoted shares. The court ruled against the assessee in various wealth-tax references, affirming the Revenue&#039;s position on the issues. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>