<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 783 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386015</link>
    <description>The writ seeking to quash the Additional Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order was dismissed due to the non-appending of the certified copy of the original order. The Revisional Authority annulled the impugned order and remanded the case to the Appellate Authority for fresh adjudication. Consequently, the writ was deemed infructuous, emphasizing compliance with procedural requirements and the Revisional Authority&#039;s power to intervene, leading to a reexamination of the appeal by the Appellate Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 783 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386015</link>
      <description>The writ seeking to quash the Additional Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order was dismissed due to the non-appending of the certified copy of the original order. The Revisional Authority annulled the impugned order and remanded the case to the Appellate Authority for fresh adjudication. Consequently, the writ was deemed infructuous, emphasizing compliance with procedural requirements and the Revisional Authority&#039;s power to intervene, leading to a reexamination of the appeal by the Appellate Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>