<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 775 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386007</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the matter to the Assessing Officer. It concluded there was no substantial question of law. The judgment emphasized the independent nature of Sections 194C(6) and (7) concerning disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) and highlighted the necessity of compliance with tax provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 775 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386007</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the matter to the Assessing Officer. It concluded there was no substantial question of law. The judgment emphasized the independent nature of Sections 194C(6) and (7) concerning disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) and highlighted the necessity of compliance with tax provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=386007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>