https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283339 A mortgage-security dispute is analysed on the basis that a receiver may be appointed under the Code of Civil Procedure when the relief is just and convenient to protect the security. The discussion treats prima facie proof of deposit of title deeds, continued borrowing, prolonged non-payment, and the possessor's enjoyment of income as relevant factors supporting protective intervention by an advocate-receiver. It also notes that a limitation defence was not accepted for immediate dismissal on the materials then before the Court, so the suit was not treated as time-barred at that stage and the limitation issue was left for determination with the suit. en-us Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:26:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283339 A mortgage-security dispute is analysed on the basis that a receiver may be appointed under the Code of Civil Procedure when the relief is just and convenient to protect the security. The discussion treats prima facie proof of deposit of title deeds, continued borrowing, prolonged non-payment, and the possessor's enjoyment of income as relevant factors supporting protective intervention by an advocate-receiver. It also notes that a limitation defence was not accepted for immediate dismissal on the materials then before the Court, so the suit was not treated as time-barred at that stage and the limitation issue was left for determination with the suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283339