<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 758 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385990</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reopening of the assessment under sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act was not valid as it was based on mere suspicion without tangible material. Additionally, the disallowance of exemption under section 11 was deemed unjustified as the Department failed to prove that the assessee was not registered under section 12AA. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 13:26:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 758 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385990</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reopening of the assessment under sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act was not valid as it was based on mere suspicion without tangible material. Additionally, the disallowance of exemption under section 11 was deemed unjustified as the Department failed to prove that the assessee was not registered under section 12AA. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>