<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1757 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283338</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat interest income as business income and allow the deduction under section 80IB. The Tribunal emphasized that no incriminating material was found during the search, thus precluding any addition under section 153A. The decision underscores the necessity of incriminating evidence for post-assessment additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1757 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283338</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat interest income as business income and allow the deduction under section 80IB. The Tribunal emphasized that no incriminating material was found during the search, thus precluding any addition under section 153A. The decision underscores the necessity of incriminating evidence for post-assessment additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>