<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (12) TMI 180 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283336</link>
    <description>The court confirmed that there was an amount of property tax in dispute in the appeal. It ruled that the appeal under Section 169 could not proceed unless the directed amount was deposited by the appellant. The District Judge was granted discretion to determine whether the admitted amount, disputed amount, or a portion of the total tax should be deposited, with or without conditions, before the appeal could be heard or decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (12) TMI 180 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283336</link>
      <description>The court confirmed that there was an amount of property tax in dispute in the appeal. It ruled that the appeal under Section 169 could not proceed unless the directed amount was deposited by the appellant. The District Judge was granted discretion to determine whether the admitted amount, disputed amount, or a portion of the total tax should be deposited, with or without conditions, before the appeal could be heard or decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>