<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1427 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283315</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed multiple issues raised by both the assessee and the revenue, remanding some to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination and deciding in favor of the assessee based on consistency and previous rulings in certain matters. The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal providing detailed reasoning for each issue considered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2019 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1427 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283315</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed multiple issues raised by both the assessee and the revenue, remanding some to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination and deciding in favor of the assessee based on consistency and previous rulings in certain matters. The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal providing detailed reasoning for each issue considered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>