<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1697 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283325</link>
    <description>The High Court condoned the delay in re-filing the appeal and upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that the Respondent, a charitable organization, was not &#039;doing business&#039; under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. The mere receipt of fees did not constitute engagement in business, and tax deduction at source did not automatically make the income taxable. The court found no substantial legal question in the ITAT&#039;s order, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of both procedural and substantive issues, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 08:18:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1697 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283325</link>
      <description>The High Court condoned the delay in re-filing the appeal and upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that the Respondent, a charitable organization, was not &#039;doing business&#039; under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. The mere receipt of fees did not constitute engagement in business, and tax deduction at source did not automatically make the income taxable. The court found no substantial legal question in the ITAT&#039;s order, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of both procedural and substantive issues, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>