<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 59 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19776</link>
    <description>Borrowed capital cannot be included in the capital base for recomputation of relief under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal had relied on an earlier High Court view allowing such inclusion, but that view was later disapproved by the Supreme Court, which held that borrowed capital does not form part of the capital base for section 80J purposes. The assessee accepted that position, and the question was answered in the negative in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:53:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 59 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19776</link>
      <description>Borrowed capital cannot be included in the capital base for recomputation of relief under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal had relied on an earlier High Court view allowing such inclusion, but that view was later disapproved by the Supreme Court, which held that borrowed capital does not form part of the capital base for section 80J purposes. The assessee accepted that position, and the question was answered in the negative in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>