https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8729 Impleading non signatories in arbitration depends on whether the facts demonstrate a mutual intent to bind signatory and non signatory entities. Exceptional application of the Group of Companies Doctrine, agency principles, assignment, and the composite nature of transactions can justify referring a non signatory to arbitration, but the claimant bears the burden to prove assent by conduct, relationship to the signatory, and commonality of subject matter; mere group membership is insufficient. en-us Thu, 19 Sep 2019 08:13:32 +0530 Thu, 19 Sep 2019 08:13:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8729 Impleading non signatories in arbitration depends on whether the facts demonstrate a mutual intent to bind signatory and non signatory entities. Exceptional application of the Group of Companies Doctrine, agency principles, assignment, and the composite nature of transactions can justify referring a non signatory to arbitration, but the claimant bears the burden to prove assent by conduct, relationship to the signatory, and commonality of subject matter; mere group membership is insufficient. Articles Corporate Laws / IBC / SEBI Thu, 19 Sep 2019 08:13:32 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8729