<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 690 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283313</link>
    <description>Pre-cast RCC box segments and RCC slabs made to railway-specific design for bridge construction were treated as non-marketable when they were fabricated only for use at the site, became part of the bridge on assembly, and were not shown to be goods known to the commercial market; on that reasoning, no central excise duty was attracted. The same site-bound manufacture and exclusive use also satisfied the exemption conditions under Notification No. 59/90-C.E., because the goods were produced at the construction site for that very work. The commentary further notes that, on these merits, the demand and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 18:29:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 690 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283313</link>
      <description>Pre-cast RCC box segments and RCC slabs made to railway-specific design for bridge construction were treated as non-marketable when they were fabricated only for use at the site, became part of the bridge on assembly, and were not shown to be goods known to the commercial market; on that reasoning, no central excise duty was attracted. The same site-bound manufacture and exclusive use also satisfied the exemption conditions under Notification No. 59/90-C.E., because the goods were produced at the construction site for that very work. The commentary further notes that, on these merits, the demand and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>