https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19774 A writ challenge to a compulsory purchase order may be refused where the challengers accepted refund without protest, allowed possession and auction proceedings to proceed, and approached the court after substantial delay. The commentary explains that such conduct can amount to delay, laches and acquiescence, especially where the transaction has been completed and third-party rights have intervened. It also notes that, although Chapter XX-C requires a reasonable opportunity of hearing and communication of recorded reasons, the governing Supreme Court precedent protects completed transactions from invalidation on those procedural grounds. On that footing, relief was declined against the compulsory purchase order. en-us Thu, 03 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:46:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19774 A writ challenge to a compulsory purchase order may be refused where the challengers accepted refund without protest, allowed possession and auction proceedings to proceed, and approached the court after substantial delay. The commentary explains that such conduct can amount to delay, laches and acquiescence, especially where the transaction has been completed and third-party rights have intervened. It also notes that, although Chapter XX-C requires a reasonable opportunity of hearing and communication of recorded reasons, the governing Supreme Court precedent protects completed transactions from invalidation on those procedural grounds. On that footing, relief was declined against the compulsory purchase order. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 03 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19774