<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 381 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283311</link>
    <description>In preventive detention, translated copies of the relied-upon documents must be true and sufficiently accurate to enable an effective representation, but minor or inconsequential discrepancies do not vitiate the order. The Bombay HC treated the differences in the Marathi translations of the medical certificates and bail application as typographical or insignificant, with no material prejudice to the detenu&#039;s defence. The Court also applied severability: even if some translated material were defective, the detention order would survive where independent incidents, recoveries, arrests, and other untainted grounds independently supported the requisite subjective satisfaction. The detention order was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 15:01:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 381 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283311</link>
      <description>In preventive detention, translated copies of the relied-upon documents must be true and sufficiently accurate to enable an effective representation, but minor or inconsequential discrepancies do not vitiate the order. The Bombay HC treated the differences in the Marathi translations of the medical certificates and bail application as typographical or insignificant, with no material prejudice to the detenu&#039;s defence. The Court also applied severability: even if some translated material were defective, the detention order would survive where independent incidents, recoveries, arrests, and other untainted grounds independently supported the requisite subjective satisfaction. The detention order was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>