https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283311 The court upheld the detention order challenged under the National Security Act, 1980. Despite discrepancies between English documents and Marathi translations, it was deemed that these did not significantly impact the petitioner's right to make an effective representation. The court found the discrepancies to be minor and not material to the case, concluding that procedural safeguards under Article 22(5) were not violated. As a result, the petition was dismissed, and the detention order was maintained as valid. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Sep 2019 15:01:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283311 The court upheld the detention order challenged under the National Security Act, 1980. Despite discrepancies between English documents and Marathi translations, it was deemed that these did not significantly impact the petitioner's right to make an effective representation. The court found the discrepancies to be minor and not material to the case, concluding that procedural safeguards under Article 22(5) were not violated. As a result, the petition was dismissed, and the detention order was maintained as valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283311