https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283309 In a passing off dispute over the mark SEFLOX, the text states that a prior user has superior rights over a later user and that an interim injunction is ordinarily not granted against a prior user merely because the mark is said to be invented. It also notes that prima facie prior use, substantial user, distinctiveness, reputation, balance of convenience and irreparable injury must be shown to justify interim relief. On the record discussed, drug licence records, sales statements and invoices were treated as supporting prior and substantial use, leading to the conclusion that interim restraint against the defendant was not sustainable. en-us Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Sep 2019 12:37:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283309 In a passing off dispute over the mark SEFLOX, the text states that a prior user has superior rights over a later user and that an interim injunction is ordinarily not granted against a prior user merely because the mark is said to be invented. It also notes that prima facie prior use, substantial user, distinctiveness, reputation, balance of convenience and irreparable injury must be shown to justify interim relief. On the record discussed, drug licence records, sales statements and invoices were treated as supporting prior and substantial use, leading to the conclusion that interim restraint against the defendant was not sustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283309