<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 1033 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283308</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners due to the lack of valid reasons provided in the transfer order under section 127(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the necessity of clear and relevant reasons for transfers, as mandated by the law. Consequently, the Court allowed the petition, quashed the transfer order, and provided the Commissioner with the option to issue a fresh order in compliance with the legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:48:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 1033 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283308</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners due to the lack of valid reasons provided in the transfer order under section 127(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the necessity of clear and relevant reasons for transfers, as mandated by the law. Consequently, the Court allowed the petition, quashed the transfer order, and provided the Commissioner with the option to issue a fresh order in compliance with the legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>