<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 697 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283304</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the Tribunal and High Court. It was concluded that the Selection Committee had adhered to the prescribed methodology for grading officers, warranting no interference. The High Court&#039;s decision was overturned, and no costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:40:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 697 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283304</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the Tribunal and High Court. It was concluded that the Selection Committee had adhered to the prescribed methodology for grading officers, warranting no interference. The High Court&#039;s decision was overturned, and no costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>