https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283302 The court upheld the validity of the confidential reports for 1964 and 1965, the order of compulsory retirement, and the non-promotion decisions. It dismissed the appeals, finding no merit in the allegations of mala fides and violations of natural justice. The court affirmed the validity of Rule 56(j) under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, stating that the appropriate authority had formed a bona fide opinion to retire the appellant in the public interest. en-us Tue, 08 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:27:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283302 The court upheld the validity of the confidential reports for 1964 and 1965, the order of compulsory retirement, and the non-promotion decisions. It dismissed the appeals, finding no merit in the allegations of mala fides and violations of natural justice. The court affirmed the validity of Rule 56(j) under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, stating that the appropriate authority had formed a bona fide opinion to retire the appellant in the public interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283302