https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385973 The court quashed the orders of provisional attachment of the bank accounts, holding that the interest of the government revenue was sufficiently secured by the excess tax paid by the applicants. The court also upheld the validity of the corrigendum and the authority of the Additional Director General to pass the provisional attachment order. The court emphasized the need for careful and balanced use of provisional attachment powers to protect revenue without unduly harming business operations. en-us Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jan 2020 12:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385973 The court quashed the orders of provisional attachment of the bank accounts, holding that the interest of the government revenue was sufficiently secured by the excess tax paid by the applicants. The court also upheld the validity of the corrigendum and the authority of the Additional Director General to pass the provisional attachment order. The court emphasized the need for careful and balanced use of provisional attachment powers to protect revenue without unduly harming business operations. Case-Laws GST Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385973