<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 725 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385957</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271B for the assessment years 2010-2011 &amp;amp; 2011-2012. It emphasized the mandatory nature of the audit requirement under section 44AB for businesses exceeding the specified turnover limit. The tribunal found the assessee&#039;s argument regarding the disclosure of entire income without expenditure claims insufficient to waive the penalty, as compliance with audit requirements was deemed necessary by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 725 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385957</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271B for the assessment years 2010-2011 &amp;amp; 2011-2012. It emphasized the mandatory nature of the audit requirement under section 44AB for businesses exceeding the specified turnover limit. The tribunal found the assessee&#039;s argument regarding the disclosure of entire income without expenditure claims insufficient to waive the penalty, as compliance with audit requirements was deemed necessary by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>