<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1253 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283296</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for both issues related to interest disallowance and deferred tax reduction. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars and the retrospective nature of the relevant amendment affecting the assessee&#039;s knowledge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:51:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1253 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283296</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for both issues related to interest disallowance and deferred tax reduction. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars and the retrospective nature of the relevant amendment affecting the assessee&#039;s knowledge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>