<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant Granted Cash Refund: No Unjust Enrichment Proven, Burden of Enhanced CVD Rate Not Passed to Buyers (Sections 28C &amp; 28D.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49322</link>
    <description>Refund in cash - unjust enrichment - the prices (both dealer price and RSP) indicate that the burden of enhanced rate of CVD has not been shifted to the buyers - the appellant has fulfilled this responsibility as cast by Section 28C and 28D of Customs Act, 1962 and Department has failed to establish any element of unjust enrichment. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:50:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:50:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant Granted Cash Refund: No Unjust Enrichment Proven, Burden of Enhanced CVD Rate Not Passed to Buyers (Sections 28C &amp; 28D.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49322</link>
      <description>Refund in cash - unjust enrichment - the prices (both dealer price and RSP) indicate that the burden of enhanced rate of CVD has not been shifted to the buyers - the appellant has fulfilled this responsibility as cast by Section 28C and 28D of Customs Act, 1962 and Department has failed to establish any element of unjust enrichment. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:50:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=49322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>