https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385944 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant failed to substantiate his claim of share ownership and directorship due to lack of evidence of payment and share certificates. The appellant's allegations of oppression and mismanagement, share forfeiture validity, and appointment of the third respondent as director were rejected for lack of proof. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant's duty to comply with legal requirements and ordered him to pay costs to the respondents. en-us Mon, 02 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:42:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385944 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant failed to substantiate his claim of share ownership and directorship due to lack of evidence of payment and share certificates. The appellant's allegations of oppression and mismanagement, share forfeiture validity, and appointment of the third respondent as director were rejected for lack of proof. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant's duty to comply with legal requirements and ordered him to pay costs to the respondents. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 02 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385944