<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 707 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385939</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging a show-cause notice for recovery of service tax, validity of section 66E(b) of the Act, and notification No.26/12. The court emphasized the need for factual determination by the Adjudicating Authority before ruling on the legal contentions raised, highlighting the importance of due process and investigation into the complex issues regarding tax liability and challenges to provisions and notifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 08:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 707 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385939</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging a show-cause notice for recovery of service tax, validity of section 66E(b) of the Act, and notification No.26/12. The court emphasized the need for factual determination by the Adjudicating Authority before ruling on the legal contentions raised, highlighting the importance of due process and investigation into the complex issues regarding tax liability and challenges to provisions and notifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>