<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 706 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385938</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s exemption claim under Notification No. 42/2011-ST required fresh factual examination because it was raised for the first time before the Tribunal and had not been considered by the adjudicating authority. As the notification&#039;s applicability, including any retrospective operation, depended on verification of eligibility conditions and relevant facts, the matter was remanded for de novo consideration. All issues were kept open for determination by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 08:14:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 706 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385938</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s exemption claim under Notification No. 42/2011-ST required fresh factual examination because it was raised for the first time before the Tribunal and had not been considered by the adjudicating authority. As the notification&#039;s applicability, including any retrospective operation, depended on verification of eligibility conditions and relevant facts, the matter was remanded for de novo consideration. All issues were kept open for determination by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>