<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1886 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283285</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal found the appeal by the Corporate Debtor to be not maintainable as per the decision of the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court. The Tribunal declined to grant relief, citing the absence of infirmity in the impugned order initiating the corporate insolvency resolution process under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Despite a request for permission to file an affidavit regarding debt payment by shareholders/Directors, the appeal was dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the default by the Corporate Debtor, confirmed the finality of the previous order, and ultimately dismissed the appeal without costs due to the parties&#039; failure to settle.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:45:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1886 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283285</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal found the appeal by the Corporate Debtor to be not maintainable as per the decision of the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court. The Tribunal declined to grant relief, citing the absence of infirmity in the impugned order initiating the corporate insolvency resolution process under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Despite a request for permission to file an affidavit regarding debt payment by shareholders/Directors, the appeal was dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the default by the Corporate Debtor, confirmed the finality of the previous order, and ultimately dismissed the appeal without costs due to the parties&#039; failure to settle.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=283285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>