<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (8) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19757</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the lands sold were agricultural based on evidence like revenue records and cultivation status. The court held that lands within a panchayat cannot be excluded as capital assets under section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, as the exclusion applies to lands within municipalities. Consequently, the tax case petition was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:14:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (8) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19757</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the lands sold were agricultural based on evidence like revenue records and cultivation status. The court held that lands within a panchayat cannot be excluded as capital assets under section 2(14) of the Income-tax Act, as the exclusion applies to lands within municipalities. Consequently, the tax case petition was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>