<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 685 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385917</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the disallowance of Rs. 49,43,544/- under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act was not justified. The tribunal found the payments to be genuine and made due to business exigencies, citing the agreement between the parties and previous judgments. Consequently, the disallowance was deleted, providing relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=587492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 685 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385917</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the disallowance of Rs. 49,43,544/- under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act was not justified. The tribunal found the payments to be genuine and made due to business exigencies, citing the agreement between the parties and previous judgments. Consequently, the disallowance was deleted, providing relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=385917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>